Majority against Tester plan
By The Helena IR - 07/16/07
Last week’s Question of the Week asked whether readers agreed with Sen. Jon Tester’s intention to vote to “de-authorize” the Iraq War on Oct. 11. More disagreed than agreed.
Among 677 votes in this unscientific poll — all the more unscientific this week because some “no” votes undoubtedly came from those who don’t want Congress to wait until Oct. 11 — there were 368 against such a de-authorization vote and 309 in favor.
Some readers’ comments:
n I strongly support Sen. Tester’s intention to de-authorize the Iraq War! We were misled by the administration in starting the war, and its continuation is extremely detrimental to our nation. We have been squandering our nation’s best resources, its people, financial treasure, and military capability on a misguided, political venture. It just might be that the most damaging effect has been to provide a rallying point for the Islamic extremists against the United States and our Western civilization.
n While the war will not be completely won overnight (we are still in Germany and Japan 60 years after victory and Korea 50 years after the ceasefire), I do not agree with the Democrats trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory just to discredit President Bush. All war is bad, but some wars need to be fought. If we had interceded in Germany before they had a chance to get their army and air force rebuilt in violation of the treaty at the end of World WarI, we could have staved off the European theater of World War II.
n Yes, and I applaud the fact that he has the courage of his convictions. To stand up and speak out publicly against “the Great decider” and his war in a red state like Montana requires “true grit” and Sen. Tester has shown that he possesses that to a high degree. n If the Democrats succeed, can the American voters take back their votes for members of the House and Senate and for members of the state Legislature if we no longer agree with them?
n The United States is barely holding on to its supposed three-branched government. Since the president will not budge on this matter, it is up to the Congress to change course and correct the situation.
Among 677 votes in this unscientific poll — all the more unscientific this week because some “no” votes undoubtedly came from those who don’t want Congress to wait until Oct. 11 — there were 368 against such a de-authorization vote and 309 in favor.
Some readers’ comments:
n I strongly support Sen. Tester’s intention to de-authorize the Iraq War! We were misled by the administration in starting the war, and its continuation is extremely detrimental to our nation. We have been squandering our nation’s best resources, its people, financial treasure, and military capability on a misguided, political venture. It just might be that the most damaging effect has been to provide a rallying point for the Islamic extremists against the United States and our Western civilization.
n While the war will not be completely won overnight (we are still in Germany and Japan 60 years after victory and Korea 50 years after the ceasefire), I do not agree with the Democrats trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory just to discredit President Bush. All war is bad, but some wars need to be fought. If we had interceded in Germany before they had a chance to get their army and air force rebuilt in violation of the treaty at the end of World WarI, we could have staved off the European theater of World War II.
n Yes, and I applaud the fact that he has the courage of his convictions. To stand up and speak out publicly against “the Great decider” and his war in a red state like Montana requires “true grit” and Sen. Tester has shown that he possesses that to a high degree. n If the Democrats succeed, can the American voters take back their votes for members of the House and Senate and for members of the state Legislature if we no longer agree with them?
n The United States is barely holding on to its supposed three-branched government. Since the president will not budge on this matter, it is up to the Congress to change course and correct the situation.
Current rating: 2.1 with 10 ratings.
Click here to register
Reader Comments:
Share Article
Steve Hartman wrote on Jul 16, 2007 10:02 AM: