Schools don’t meet federal standards, despite students doing well overall

By ANGELA BRANDT - IR Staff Writer

The majority of students in the Helena School District’s two middle schools and two high schools passed the most recent No Child Left Behind Act testing.

But the schools didn’t.

Helena Public Schools Superintendent Bruce Messinger said No Child Left Behind divides the student population into 11 groups.

These groups include those students evaluated as economically disadvantaged and as students with special needs.

At least one of those two groups’ test scores didn’t meet the standards required by No Child Left Behind at the schools, Messinger said.

Standards are the same for all students, regardless of what group identification they may fall under.

The standards are based on the annual math and reading testing, in addition to attendance and graduation rates.

If the students in even one of the 11 identified categories doesn’t meet requirements, the whole school, and subsequently the whole district, doesn’t pass.

That means that even though all 11 Helena elementary schools passed the fifth annual Adequate Yearly Progress Report, the Helena elementary district failed because of the two middle schools’ scores.

The middle schools are included in the elementary district.

If schools and districts do not meet the standards for two consecutive years, they face such consequences as revising their comprehensive education plans, something Messinger said Helena schools do anyway.

This is the second year that Helena’s larger schools — the middle schools and high schools — didn’t meet the requirements, he said.

In order for the scores of any of the 11 identified groups in the student population to potentially determine whether an entire school meets its requirements, that group must include at least 40 students in the school.

That makes smaller schools less likely to have an identified group of students fail.

“What we’ll do now — we’ll communicate with parents,” Messinger said. “Fundamentally, there are some concerns we have with the federal law.

“A part of that is the way it is so dependent on a few variables. Students can be successful but not on a specific test.”

Another possible repercussion under No Child Left Behind is giving students school-choice options, something Helena already offers.

As consequences progress each year the standards aren’t met, schools also may be required to offer tutoring services and teacher training.

The goal of No Child Left Behind is for 100 percent of students to meet the standards by 2014.

In Montana, 15 percent of school districts did not meet the federal requirements.

Many of the state’s schools do not have enough students to have 40 in the identified groups, unlike the four Helena schools that did not make the cut, Messinger said.

Out of the larger districts in Montana, those in Bozeman are the only ones that met the requirements.

Messinger said Helena schools will not change their curriculum in order to focus more on meeting the federal reading and math requirements.

“We are always working to improve education. If the law ended tomorrow, we would still do the same things,” he said.

3.9 stars
Current rating: 3.9 with 7 ratings.


Untitled Document Please login to enter comment :
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Click here to register
Reader Comments:

purple wrote on Sep 15, 2007 8:16 PM:

" One intent of "no child left behind" was it was to measure the quality of the TEACHERS. Sadly the teachers, administrators, and their unions care more about protecting them instead of wanting to ensure this nation's youth are provided the best education possible. I vote AGAINST each and every mill levy which comes up for a vote because I am dead set AGAINST flushing more of my hard earned tax dollars down the toilet known as the education system, a system which is broken. Instead of fixing it, all they want to do is ignore it with promises that if we just give them more money, they will fix it. "

James wrote on Sep 14, 2007 12:19 PM:

" Why is it that every time our students and schools fail, an administrator steps up to lay blame elsewhere. Mr. Bruce Messinger, perhaps you do not understand the intent of NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND. The goal is to have ZERO students fail any of the required tests, and by my calculations, at least a MINIMUM of 40 students in your schools are failing these federal standards? Are we taxpayers supposed to accept this fact? Your duty is not to criticize the law or to find excuses, it is to ensure that EACH and EVERY single student meets the federal standards. It is your teachers' responsibility to identify the students requiring additional tutoring in order to acheive this goal. This is the second year your schools have failed in this charge. The article points out that the goal is to have 100 percent of students meeting the standards by the year 2014. I say that it should be 100 percent by the year 2008. You stated, "Fundamentally, there are some concerns we have with the federal law" and "If the law ended tomorrow, we would still do the same things." I know it is not your intent to imply that you do not feel that the law should apply to you and your schools, but it is this exact attitude that excuses failure, that is harming our students. From a parent's perspective, the problem with the law is not that it's goals are too high; it is that too many loopholes exist for children to slip through, and too many administrators exist that make excuses for failure. We expect more of you and you staff Mr. Messinger. I would like to see a followup article in which you issue an apology to the parents and students who our schools have failed and a guarantee that the teachers and administrators will exceed the federal standards. This is the least that we owe our children, not excuses. "


Text Size:
Small | Medium | Large

View/Post Comments
 Email this story
  Print this story
 Rate Article
 Share Article

submit to reddit Delicious Digg!