Misguided forestry
By Stan Grace, 3365 Tizer Road - 05/12/08
Not too many years ago we had forest management plans to manage for these very situations. They called for timber harvest in areas that mature trees were becoming susceptible to loss by insect epidemics and other natural events. By doing this we helped maintain a sustaining timber growth and provided commodities that were beneficial while often replacing the need to exploit more finite natural resources.
Ironically these plans were based on professional knowledge and science but were replaced or over ridden by public protest that saw preservation as the key to managing forests. Well folks, we are now seeing the results in our desire to find a way to deal with dying trees. Nature is dynamic and maintaining old growth is a static situation. This desire is not unlike maintaining old people. We have yet to discover a suitable method although freeze drying appears to have some promise.
Current rating: 4.5 with 12 ratings.
Click here to register
Reader Comments:
Steelrider wrote on May 12, 2008 7:39 AM:
One need only look at S Cal where 10 million trees stand dead from Bark Beetles. The 250 million dollar annual fund to clear the dead trees over 12 years has recently been amended. They are now using the money to take out healthy ones. They have learned over 12 years it is the only way to stop the beetle. They won't attack healthy trees that have plenty of water. "





racer wrote on May 12, 2008 4:03 PM: