Wolf-quota plan: 75

By EVE BYRON - Independent Record - 06/10/08

Photo by Tracy Brooks, courtesy of Mission Wolf/USFWS - Although the wolf was delisted in February, the decision is being contested in court. Meanwhile, state wildlife officials are planning a wolf hunt for the fall.
A quota of 75 wolves for Montana's first ever state-sanctioned hunting season will be discussed Thursday during the Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission meeting in Helena.

The 75-wolf quota from the state FWP agency is fairly consistent with a recommendation in December by Montana's Wolf Management Advisory Council. That 12-person panel of ranchers, hunters, scientists and others noted that 130 wolves could be killed in Montana in one year without reducing the overall number of wolves in the state; half of those deaths were expected to come from wolves shot for preying on livestock.

The 130 figure is similar to the anticipated population increase next year because of births and immigration, according to Carolyn Sime, statewide wolf coordinator for FWP.

Any quota adopted at Thursday's commission meeting will be submitted for public comment through at least July 18, with the final quota adoption set for Aug. 5.

Public hunting of wolves has been long been a part of Montana's wolf conservation and management plan, which is moving forward after the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in February removed wolves from the list of animals protected under the Endangered Species Act.

That delisting currently is the focus of a federal court lawsuit, with U.S. District Court Judge Donald Molloy expected to rule soon on a request by 11 environmental groups for an injunction that would halt the delisting in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho.

Still, Montana wildlife officials want to have a plan in place to manage wolves if Molloy decides he won't issue an injunction, saying that without some type of hunting season, the wolf population will grow exponentially.

Wolves were put on the Endangered Species Act list in 1973 after being hunted to near extinction in the lower 48 states. But reintroduction and recovery work started in 1995 have expanded their population, with more than 1,200 gray wolves populating the Northern Rockies.

Montana's management plan calls for a minimum population of 100 wolves. Initially, the state found 10 breeding pairs to be a sustainable population goal, but the advisory council revised that upward to 15 pairs to ensure the success of the species.

Montana now is home to at least 422 wolves, which includes 39 breeding pairs in eight packs, Sime said, and many people believe wolves are ready to be managed as any other wildlife species, which includes hunting.

Last February, the FWP Commission adopted a regulatory framework and season structure for public hunting of wolves. The season will run from Oct. 26 through Dec. 31, or whenever the quota is reached.

Reclassification of wolves as a species in need of management also needs to be done as part of the regulatory steps for the FWP Commission. That will take place through an administrative rule process, which also will include wolf conflict management guidelines.

FWP officials have said they intend to proceed cautiously to ensure continued wolf recovery.

Reporter Eve Byron: 447-4076 or eve.byron@helenair.com

4 stars
4 stars with 1 rating.


Untitled Document Please login to enter comment :
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Click here to register
Reader Comments:

wrote on Jun 11, 2008 8:16 AM:

" Dear 4061111,

I am sure you have your reasons for your beliefs.

First, due to numerous unreported and illegal incidents along the Rocky Mountain front, there are no and have been NO packs or even pairs of wolves established here. Ranchers and government planes which allegedly kill coyotes only, do not even give wolves the chance which our more secretive grizzlies have survived under up here.

So wolves are not and within my lifetime have never been out of control in this part of Montana.

In many parts of the United States, hunting continues to decline in ever statistical way of looking at it. People in our country simply are not interested in killing everything that walks any more. This will result in numerous challenges to wildlife "management". Montana can either go with the flow or resist change.

There are numerous opportunities to create sustainable and very economically viable enterprises in taking new outlooks on existing situations. I believe the old saying about making lemonade applies here.

During the course of my career, I have witnessed numerous "management" failures. My personal understanding based upon scientific principles, is that at times mankind is better just to leave things as nature intends it to be. In the long run there are often less drastic consequences for us to continually adjust to. Think about Fire season here.

Or you can rigidly resist change. However, I would caution that this leads to breaking points and larger catastrophes than humans often foresee.

While I am a wildlife biologist, my father was not. And my father lost 7,500 acres in the 1960's when farming and raising the 500 head of cattle was a difficult proposition on farms that did not have government subsidies at that time.

His major mistakes were in second guessing nature. My suggestion is for ranchers and farmers to try to develop a little more co-operative philosophy with Nature.

I am embarrassed to be a resident of a state which regularly slaughters any Bison that wander a few yards off our national park. This is ignorant and benefits No one in the long run. Grizzlies and wolves can and should be allowed to thrive because they are a natural part of our ecology.

I know many people think ecology is some voodoo art form practiced by groups you like to call "liberals". But on this one I will also suggest that you examine the root of one word- Conservation- and what this means in relation to the word -Conservative. Perhaps then you will understand more about Ecology. "

4061111 wrote on Jun 10, 2008 7:03 AM:

" The people advocating no control of wolf population generally tend to a) be people that don't live with wolves in their backyard and are not affected by the problems they create and b) jump on bandwagons for a "cause" without fully understanding the negative impacts their idea will cause.

The wolves are back, they will be sustained, so don't expect people who live with them and have livestock to keep sitting back and paying the price for idealism. "


Text Size:
Small | Medium | Large

View/Post Comments
 Email this story
  Print this story
 Rate Article
 Share Article

submit to reddit Delicious Digg!