City official questions airport lease
By JOHN HARRINGTON - Independent Record - 07/17/08
A memo to the commission from City Attorney David Nielsen notes that while the airport board adopted its rules for leasing or selling property in 2003, those rules were never approved by the city commission, a requirement under state law. It is yet unclear whether the Lewis and Clark County Commission ever approved the bylaws of the airport authority. The authority is appointed and overseen by both the city and the county.
“Those rules needed to be adopted (by the city), and they have not been adopted,” City Commissioner Alan Peura said. “I would assume the airport board lacks the authority to act upon this letter of intent, because (its rules) haven’t been approved by the city commission.”
While hesitant to say for sure without doing more research, Nielsen acknowledged that “it is a possible interpretation, there may be a lack of authority.”
The lack of approval from the governing bodies could call into question not only the letter of agreement signed last month between the airport and Blue Cross for 9 acres for a new office building for the insurer, but Peura wondered what it might mean for the legality of several existing airport leases with other private tenants inked in recent years, including Costco and the Independent Record.
“That’s my hesitancy — this has been going on for quite a few years,” Nielsen said. Peura shared with the commission at Wednesday’s work session a three-page memo regarding his concerns with the airport board and several proposed actions in the aftermath of the deal with Blue Cross. “The airport said they would never move forward with a decision of this magnitude without discussing it with the commission, and they did move forward, they did not discuss it,” he said.
His requests included an audit of the airport board and its compliance with open meeting laws; an interim zoning overlay to change any airport land currently zoned for business back to airport zoning, “essentially freezing any additional development in that area,” he said, until a review of the airport board, traffic, public transit and the growth policy can be completed; and a report that “analyzes the impacts in the Helena area of public land being used to subsidize private business development in competition with private land development.”
Other commissioners and city officials, though, weren’t keen to immediately devote extensive personnel and financial resources to all of Peura’s questions at the expense of existing projects.
“I’m not prepared to commit myself (to these requests),” Mayor Jim Smith said.
Peura also asked that the airport board start sharing its meeting minutes and other official documents with the city as a matter of course.
“I understand that’s already in place under the airport authority charter, but that it’s not taking place,” Peura said.
Alan Nicholson, developer of the Great Northern Town Center, attended the work session and told the commission that the taxable value of land in the Great Northern is 10 times the taxable value of Costco’s land and 17 times the taxable value of the Independent Record’s lot. He questioned whether allowing so much development on public land is appropriate.
“It should be embarrassing to Blue Cross to do this and say it’s the most economic thing they can do,” he said. “It’s only the most economic thing they can do because they’re getting a subsidy from the public, and that isn’t right.”
Reporter John Harrington: 447-4080 or john.harrington@helenair.com.
Current rating: 3.6 with 31 ratings.
Click here to register
Reader Comments:
Nutmeg wrote on Jul 22, 2008 5:57 PM:
I just don't see much value in holding a grudge. Maybe you can try to be positive and work things out in a productive way. That way you can actually enjoy yourself when you go downtown. And - hint hint - other people can enjoy being around you. "
MtLadyBiker wrote on Jul 22, 2008 4:22 PM:
And a comment to "NUTMEG" -- stop saying that BCBS is making money off of state employees. BCBS manages your policies FOR the state of montana. "
MTRICH wrote on Jul 21, 2008 10:38 PM:
Nutmeg wrote on Jul 21, 2008 7:38 AM:
mark1228 wrote on Jul 19, 2008 12:55 PM:
purple wrote on Jul 18, 2008 7:33 PM:
Tokyo is mind-bogglingly packed so close together - like sardines.
With the price of land sky high in Japan, they build UP not out. "
Nutmeg wrote on Jul 18, 2008 11:45 AM:
All of us taxpayers of Montana pay millions in premiums each year for our state employees - most of those dollars go to BCBS. I think BCBS needs to do what State Fund did. Take some time to explore the best Downtown option. By the way, in my opinion the best option does not involve an 11 story building.
Also, I am not sure why people percieve there is a parking problem downtown. I shop, dine and work downtown. At all times of day/evening there is plenty of parking. Even on festival evenings/weekends. "
diazo wrote on Jul 18, 2008 10:06 AM:
I applaud Commissioner Peura for his efforts to get some public input into this very consequential use of public land. I would hope that the other Commissioners would step up and join him. "
downtowner wrote on Jul 17, 2008 10:02 PM:
Grass fields may please the Open Space crowd, but we already need more businesses and more taxpayers sharing these property tax burdens. It is in our (taxpayers') best interest to let airport directors "create" income streams by entering into these lease arrangements.
I can't tell if Mr. Nicholson is the pot or the kettle. He's only slightly LESS ashamed to take in BID money for his enterprises than he is to beg to defer his BID repayment so far out only his estate will have to worry about making good on his low-interest "loan" . . . oh, that's right, the little people of Helena were never told 'the rest of the story' on that sweet deal.
Commissioner Peura may not have been in office at that time, but why doesn't he offer a similar BID "loan" to Blue Cross to get them to stay downtown?
My creative solution: give the airport managers take a turn as City Commissioners. Odds are, we wouldn't be having this discussion. "
MTRICH wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:41 PM:
spring wrote on Jul 17, 2008 8:56 PM:
On the other hand, the city could go a long way with cleaner conditions, parking or shuttles, and being more user friendly.
And while I'm at it..I wish just once Mayor Smith would say a simple yes or no and not wish wash with words before he gets to what he intends to say or do. "
purple wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:33 PM:
Hey BCBS, pack it in and relocate to someplace like Boulder, Dillon, Whitehall, or Three Forks. I think you will find those smaller communities far more receptive to you opening your offices there.
I find it comical that Nickelson should be commenting. The 'great northern' reminds me of Tokyo where they cram as many buildings as possibile into the smallest space. "
sleepinggiant wrote on Jul 17, 2008 6:21 PM:
common sense wrote on Jul 17, 2008 4:51 PM:
What a sniveling loser.
Does he want to halt development in Helena? Helena is growing, the epi-center is Custer Avenue and Montana Avenue. Don't forget there are as many people in the Valley as there are in town and this location is centrally located for all. Why would any business want to deal with such a vindicative commission? I'd run, not walk, from the downtown area if this is what is to come. "
downtowner wrote on Jul 17, 2008 3:41 PM:
Fact is, the airport operation REDUCES the cost to taxpayers by smartly creating income streams by leasing their property.
Cut the fear mongering about a collapsing downtown. It will be a great place for our families with or without Blue Cross.
And get ready to write bigger city tax and fee checks if you seek to undo existing lease arrangements with just ONE of the friendly corporate giants out on airport leases, because our small crew of city lawyers will have to hire a team of expensive consultant lawyers to ride into a battle you won't win. "
agdcas wrote on Jul 17, 2008 3:15 PM:
There are benefits to different people either way they go. Maybe the state can take over the buildings and centeralize more of it's offices. No matter who moves into those buildings- they're going to have to address parking. "
Rambler01 wrote on Jul 17, 2008 2:27 PM:
Also, I wonder if Nicholson is embarrassed to get BID funding for Great Northern development?? "
reuse wrote on Jul 17, 2008 10:52 AM:
freetime wrote on Jul 17, 2008 10:20 AM:
They want businesses to stay in that area then work with them to improve parking and other issues that the workers and the general public have concerns about! "
steelrider wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:29 AM:
I have spoken with a lot of citizens that support Alan Peura, now it's time for our city officials to get behind him as well...before it's too late. "
Nutmeg wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:35 AM:
Since Helena is home to the majority of staff people for the State I believe it is imperative for BC/BS to invest their dollars wisely, that will build upon existing infrastructure for the city where we live.
BC/BS needs to look again at a downtown location. "
Text Size:
Small | Medium | Large
View/Post Comments
Email this story
Print this story
Rate Article
Share Article
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
- Genuine Montanan
- FDA declares it's OK to eat tomatoes again
- Montana Guard to receive new armored vehicles
- Acting surgeon general to visit Montana
- Obama campaign opens offices
- Devil’s broken elbow
- City official questions airport lease
- Guard limiting training because of wildfire danger
- Report: Drug use highest among American Indians
- Partnership doubles capacity of crude pipeline
- Some U.S. soldiers in Iraq yearn to see more action





Nutmeg wrote on Jul 23, 2008 6:03 PM:
The state employees receive over $7,000 in health benefits each year. Multiply that times the number of state workers. Then add in the expenses that state employees pay to have their dependents covered. BCBS manages the plan. BCBS also covers the bulk of those employees with their health care plans.
This doesn't mean they 'owe' Montana anything more than what is in their contract. But it does mean they are a partner with us. For example if they took their customer service department to India, they would save much money for taxpayers, but the trade off would be diminished service and other economic factors would be impacted.
Do the math - but don't forget to add in the greater costs. "