Former IR reporter’s novel stirs worldwide controversy

By GWEN FLORIO - Missoulian - 08/17/08

MISSOULA — Sherry Jones wasn’t supposed to be in Missoula this week. She should have been in Chicago or Los Angeles or San Francisco, promoting her first novel, “Jewel of Medina.”

It was slated to arrive on bookstore shelves Tuesday. It’s not there.

Jones’ publisher, Random House, yanked it after concerns were raised that the book would cause the sort of deadly uproar that accompanied cartoons depicting Muhammad in a Danish newspaper, or the publication of Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses,” a novel dealing in part with the life of Muhammad.

Both sparked death threats and rioting by people who found those depictions offensive, and Rushdie lived in hiding for years after his book came out in 1988. Three of his book’s translators were attacked, one fatally.

In the case of the 2005 cartoons in Jyllands-Posten, dozens of protesters were killed, and Danish embassies around the world were attacked.

Random House said in a statement that it pulled Jones’ book after “credible and unrelated sources” had cautioned that publication of the historical novel, about A’isha, the youngest of Muhammad’s 12 wives and concubines, “could incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment.”

“I was devastated,” Jones said Friday during an interview at the Hob Nob on Higgins. “I felt the closest thing to depression that I have ever felt in my life.”

Jones fled Spokane, where she now lives, to Missoula on Tuesday after an interview with a reporter for an Arabic paper who, she said, asked her questions like “Don’t you care about the feelings of Muslims?” and “Do you think it’s OK to write about the Prophet’s sex life?”

“I snapped. I burst into tears” after the interview, said Jones, who said her life has been a nonstop crush of publicity after the Wall Street Journal wrote about the situation earlier this month. Hence, her trip to Missoula, “my home where I feel safe and comfortable.”

Her situation has attracted worldwide attention.

“This is censorship by fear,” Rushdie — whose publisher is Random House —wrote Thursday in an e-mail to the Associated Press, “and it sets a very bad precedent indeed.”

Pakistan’s English-language Daily Times wrote about the flap, and newspapers in Great Britain, Rushdie’s current home, are having a field day.

Mick Hume, writing Tuesday in the Times of London, called it “another example of a quiet wave of self-censorship and cultural cowardice sweeping Western art circles.”

Meanwhile, Britain’s Guardian newspaper also on Tuesday reported that attorney Geoffrey Robertson — whose book “The Tyrannicide Brief” was published stateside by Random House’s Anchor Books — has called for the publisher to pay Jones “substantial compensation,” and to place the book on the Web where everyone can read it.

On Friday, Jones did a telephone interview with a Serbian reporter. The book is being published in that country this week and is still slated for publication in Spain and Italy, she said. Meanwhile, her agent is negotiating with other American publishers about publication here.

It’s quite a change from a year ago, when Jones — a former Missoulian entertainment reporter and a reporter for the Independent Record in the mid-1980s — was living every debut author’s dream, with a $100,000, two-book contract from Random House for “Jewel of Medina” and a sequel about A’isha’s life after the death of Muhammad.

But in May, she said, her agent got a call from Random House about concerns raised by Denise Spellberg, an associate professor of Islamic history at the University of Texas in Austin.

Jones, who had relied on some of Spellberg’s research for her novel, had sent her a copy of the book. Spellberg didn’t like it.

Spellberg did not respond to a Missoulian request for comment, but she told the Wall Street Journal’s Asra Q. Nomani that the novel was a “very ugly, stupid piece of work,” calling it “soft-core pornography.”

Spellberg also called an editor at Random House’s Knopf imprint, urging them to pull the book, Nomani wrote.

Later that month, after consultation with other experts on Islam, Random House canceled its contract with Jones. The publisher’s statement said its sources felt “this book might be offensive to some in the Muslim community.”

Jones said that even as some have criticized her book, others have called her an “Islamopanderer.”

“At the same time the Muslims want to kill me, I’m pandering to them?” she asked. “ ... When people talk about an offended Muslim being the same as a violent Muslim, to me that sounds like racism.”

Jones said she researched her book by studying Arabic at the University of Montana, and by taking an Islamic history course taught by Mehrdad Kia, director of the university’s Central and Southwest Asia program. She also read widely about Islamic history and culture, she said.

Her aim, she said, was to “honor” Muslim women by writing about A’isha, who was betrothed to the Islamic prophet Muhammad at age 6, later married him, and, after his death, became a political adviser and even directed an army during a battle.

The more she learned about A’isha, she said, the more she thought, “ ‘What a pistol.’ She seemed like someone I would want to know.”

The book begins with a description of an accusation of adultery against A’isha: “Scandal blew in on the errant wind when I rode into Medina clutching Safwan’s waist. My neighbors rushed into the street. What they saw: my wrapper fallen to my shoulders, unheeded. Loose hair lashing my face. The wife of God’s Prophet entwined around another man.”

Jones said that although she writes of Muhammad’s and A’isha’s marriage being consummated, she never describes the pair actually having sex. Still, criticism of the book has given her pause. For her next book, she’d planned to focus on Sukayna, Muhammad’s granddaughter. Now she’s having second thoughts.

“I’d like to take a break from Arabic history,” she said, and there’s another legendary woman who intrigues her.

“Lady Godiva,” she said. “I read that ride never happened.”

4.5 stars
Current rating: 4.5 with 12 ratings.


Untitled Document Please login to enter comment :
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Click here to register
Reader Comments:

hesperado wrote on Aug 17, 2008 6:29 PM:

" Some problems a person of ordinary intelligence (me) can spot:

At the same time the Muslims want to kill me, Im pandering to them?

Basic logical fallacy Sherry Jones is evincing here. Merely raising the murderous ire of certain Muslims does not automatically render that person immune from stupidity about Islam that would lead to pandering. Both simultaneously are indeed quite possible, given the complexity of politically correct stupidity, and given the ultra-fanatical intransigence of certain Muslims.

... When people talk about an offended Muslim being the same as a violent Muslim, to me that sounds like racism.

1. The problem with the phenomenon of "being offended" in Islamic culture is that it is based on fanatical and intolerant and regressive measurements of what constitutes "offense"; and this culture of "offense" is directly related to the wider culture of fanaticism in Islam that helps to nourish and motivate not only the terrorists but also the lynchers, rioters, honor-killers, wife-beaters, as well as the various trans-national mujahideen murdering people in the Philippines, south Thailand, Indonesia, Turkey, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, Argentina, USA and Canada.

And now for the writer of this article, Gwen Florio:

"Her aim, she said, was to honor Muslim women by writing about Aisha, who was betrothed to the Islamic prophet Muhammad at age 6, later married him..."

This is blatantly false: The most authoritative sources for Muslims, Bukhari's hadiths, say in at least three different places that Mohammed married Aisha when she was 6, and consummated that marriage (which means had sex with her) when she was 9. Ms. Florio also implies, with her oddly demure "later married him" phrase, that she could have married him WAY later -- like say, 15 or 16? Many of the non-Muslims reading this piece who don't know better will gloss over that and think Mohammed just married a "young woman".

"Jones said that although she writes of Muhammads and Aishas marriage being consummated, she never describes the pair actually having sex."

She sure gets close:

"the pain of consummation soon melted away. Muhammad was so gentle. I hardly felt the scorpion's sting. To be in his arms, skin to skin, was the bliss I had longed for all my life."

1. Remember, this is describing the sex of a man in his 50s with a 9-year-old girl.

2. And remember too that this man in his 50s is considered by all Muslims today to be the "most perfect man" and "best model of conduct" (al-insan al-kamil; uswa hasana) for ALL TIME, not just for the 7th century. He is, in fact, so important and good to Muslims that they consider death to be an appropriate punishment for anyone publically mocking or condemning Mohammed.

Anyone with basic common sense can put these two facts together and come to the appropriate rational conclusion about Islam, and about so morally bankrupt as to support it and/or follow it. "

MtMadeMan wrote on Aug 17, 2008 6:09 PM:

" More evidence of cowardice from the media. "

Shonkin wrote on Aug 17, 2008 3:07 PM:

" Mohammed's "marriage" to Aisha is one of those ugly things Muslims don't like to talk about. He took her to live in his house when she was six, and he deflowered her when she was nine.

Muslims call it a consummation of her marriage. Civilized people call sex with a little girl "rape."

Does that mean I don't consider Muslims civilized? Look at lower Manhattan, and you tell me. "

MTRICH wrote on Aug 17, 2008 9:41 AM:

" They say not to judge Islam by the actions of the few. That sounds reasonable to me. I do however judge Islam by the inactions of the many. When a person insults my religion I get angry but I do not try to kill them. When an "artist" violated the image of Mary the Mother of Jesus with feces, Christians world wide got angry but did not burn down the museum or attack the artist physically. The "art" was not pulled and was actually presented in a US Government funded art museum in New York City. The Christians, while angry about such sacrilegious behaviors, would never tolerate either the talk or the actions of killing someone for it in this day and age. But make a carton, write a book, make a statement against a person of the Islamic faith and they try to kill you. I hear what I would like to believe is a minority of Muslims talking of killing and death and intolerance. But as theirs is the only large scale voice I hear from that religion, I am slowly becoming convinced this evil behavior is, in fact, the voice of Islam. It is time for the real Muslims to speak up or I for one, will assume that is what I have been hearing all this time. "

rabbit wrote on Aug 17, 2008 7:52 AM:

" The religious bullying that Jones is experiencing is not unique to Islam. It must be confronted and resisted at every turn. Civilization depends on us doing so. "

Common Sense wrote on Aug 17, 2008 1:07 AM:

" She can't write about Lady Godiva! What if the Europeans don't like it? There could be death threats. Best not to get them riled up. Maybe it would be best if she were more P.C. and didn't ever make anyone mad. Watch that sidelong glance, don't think bad thoughts, just who do you think you are. Who cares about the truth if the truth hurts somebodies feelings. Don't you know it's the appearance of things that matter to liberals not the truth or what is just and right? "


Text Size:
Small | Medium | Large

View/Post Comments
 Email this story
  Print this story
 Rate Article
 Share Article

submit to reddit Delicious Digg!