Former IR reporter’s novel stirs worldwide controversy
By GWEN FLORIO - Missoulian - 08/17/08
It was slated to arrive on bookstore shelves Tuesday. It’s not there.
Jones’ publisher, Random House, yanked it after concerns were raised that the book would cause the sort of deadly uproar that accompanied cartoons depicting Muhammad in a Danish newspaper, or the publication of Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses,” a novel dealing in part with the life of Muhammad.
Both sparked death threats and rioting by people who found those depictions offensive, and Rushdie lived in hiding for years after his book came out in 1988. Three of his book’s translators were attacked, one fatally.
In the case of the 2005 cartoons in Jyllands-Posten, dozens of protesters were killed, and Danish embassies around the world were attacked.
Random House said in a statement that it pulled Jones’ book after “credible and unrelated sources” had cautioned that publication of the historical novel, about A’isha, the youngest of Muhammad’s 12 wives and concubines, “could incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment.” “I was devastated,” Jones said Friday during an interview at the Hob Nob on Higgins. “I felt the closest thing to depression that I have ever felt in my life.”
Jones fled Spokane, where she now lives, to Missoula on Tuesday after an interview with a reporter for an Arabic paper who, she said, asked her questions like “Don’t you care about the feelings of Muslims?” and “Do you think it’s OK to write about the Prophet’s sex life?”
“I snapped. I burst into tears” after the interview, said Jones, who said her life has been a nonstop crush of publicity after the Wall Street Journal wrote about the situation earlier this month. Hence, her trip to Missoula, “my home where I feel safe and comfortable.”
Her situation has attracted worldwide attention.
“This is censorship by fear,” Rushdie — whose publisher is Random House —wrote Thursday in an e-mail to the Associated Press, “and it sets a very bad precedent indeed.”
Pakistan’s English-language Daily Times wrote about the flap, and newspapers in Great Britain, Rushdie’s current home, are having a field day.
Mick Hume, writing Tuesday in the Times of London, called it “another example of a quiet wave of self-censorship and cultural cowardice sweeping Western art circles.”
Meanwhile, Britain’s Guardian newspaper also on Tuesday reported that attorney Geoffrey Robertson — whose book “The Tyrannicide Brief” was published stateside by Random House’s Anchor Books — has called for the publisher to pay Jones “substantial compensation,” and to place the book on the Web where everyone can read it.
On Friday, Jones did a telephone interview with a Serbian reporter. The book is being published in that country this week and is still slated for publication in Spain and Italy, she said. Meanwhile, her agent is negotiating with other American publishers about publication here.
It’s quite a change from a year ago, when Jones — a former Missoulian entertainment reporter and a reporter for the Independent Record in the mid-1980s — was living every debut author’s dream, with a $100,000, two-book contract from Random House for “Jewel of Medina” and a sequel about A’isha’s life after the death of Muhammad.
But in May, she said, her agent got a call from Random House about concerns raised by Denise Spellberg, an associate professor of Islamic history at the University of Texas in Austin.
Jones, who had relied on some of Spellberg’s research for her novel, had sent her a copy of the book. Spellberg didn’t like it.
Spellberg did not respond to a Missoulian request for comment, but she told the Wall Street Journal’s Asra Q. Nomani that the novel was a “very ugly, stupid piece of work,” calling it “soft-core pornography.”
Spellberg also called an editor at Random House’s Knopf imprint, urging them to pull the book, Nomani wrote.
Later that month, after consultation with other experts on Islam, Random House canceled its contract with Jones. The publisher’s statement said its sources felt “this book might be offensive to some in the Muslim community.”
Jones said that even as some have criticized her book, others have called her an “Islamopanderer.”
“At the same time the Muslims want to kill me, I’m pandering to them?” she asked. “ ... When people talk about an offended Muslim being the same as a violent Muslim, to me that sounds like racism.”
Jones said she researched her book by studying Arabic at the University of Montana, and by taking an Islamic history course taught by Mehrdad Kia, director of the university’s Central and Southwest Asia program. She also read widely about Islamic history and culture, she said.
Her aim, she said, was to “honor” Muslim women by writing about A’isha, who was betrothed to the Islamic prophet Muhammad at age 6, later married him, and, after his death, became a political adviser and even directed an army during a battle.
The more she learned about A’isha, she said, the more she thought, “ ‘What a pistol.’ She seemed like someone I would want to know.”
The book begins with a description of an accusation of adultery against A’isha: “Scandal blew in on the errant wind when I rode into Medina clutching Safwan’s waist. My neighbors rushed into the street. What they saw: my wrapper fallen to my shoulders, unheeded. Loose hair lashing my face. The wife of God’s Prophet entwined around another man.”
Jones said that although she writes of Muhammad’s and A’isha’s marriage being consummated, she never describes the pair actually having sex. Still, criticism of the book has given her pause. For her next book, she’d planned to focus on Sukayna, Muhammad’s granddaughter. Now she’s having second thoughts.
“I’d like to take a break from Arabic history,” she said, and there’s another legendary woman who intrigues her.
“Lady Godiva,” she said. “I read that ride never happened.”
Current rating: 4.5 with 12 ratings.
Click here to register
Reader Comments:
Shonkin wrote on Aug 17, 2008 3:07 PM:
Muslims call it a consummation of her marriage. Civilized people call sex with a little girl "rape."
Does that mean I don't consider Muslims civilized? Look at lower Manhattan, and you tell me. "
MTRICH wrote on Aug 17, 2008 9:41 AM:
rabbit wrote on Aug 17, 2008 7:52 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Aug 17, 2008 1:07 AM:
Text Size:
Small | Medium | Large
View/Post Comments
Email this story
Print this story
Rate Article
Share Article
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
- Medals for their mettle
- Former IR reporter’s novel stirs worldwide controversy
- Analysis: Bonds would up taxes by 48.5 percent
- DOR starts property reappraisal process
- Second century brings new challenges for Glacier
- All-class, all-district reunion
- Fire claims vacation home in Dearborn






hesperado wrote on Aug 17, 2008 6:29 PM:
At the same time the Muslims want to kill me, Im pandering to them?
Basic logical fallacy Sherry Jones is evincing here. Merely raising the murderous ire of certain Muslims does not automatically render that person immune from stupidity about Islam that would lead to pandering. Both simultaneously are indeed quite possible, given the complexity of politically correct stupidity, and given the ultra-fanatical intransigence of certain Muslims.
... When people talk about an offended Muslim being the same as a violent Muslim, to me that sounds like racism.
1. The problem with the phenomenon of "being offended" in Islamic culture is that it is based on fanatical and intolerant and regressive measurements of what constitutes "offense"; and this culture of "offense" is directly related to the wider culture of fanaticism in Islam that helps to nourish and motivate not only the terrorists but also the lynchers, rioters, honor-killers, wife-beaters, as well as the various trans-national mujahideen murdering people in the Philippines, south Thailand, Indonesia, Turkey, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, Argentina, USA and Canada.
And now for the writer of this article, Gwen Florio:
"Her aim, she said, was to honor Muslim women by writing about Aisha, who was betrothed to the Islamic prophet Muhammad at age 6, later married him..."
This is blatantly false: The most authoritative sources for Muslims, Bukhari's hadiths, say in at least three different places that Mohammed married Aisha when she was 6, and consummated that marriage (which means had sex with her) when she was 9. Ms. Florio also implies, with her oddly demure "later married him" phrase, that she could have married him WAY later -- like say, 15 or 16? Many of the non-Muslims reading this piece who don't know better will gloss over that and think Mohammed just married a "young woman".
"Jones said that although she writes of Muhammads and Aishas marriage being consummated, she never describes the pair actually having sex."
She sure gets close:
"the pain of consummation soon melted away. Muhammad was so gentle. I hardly felt the scorpion's sting. To be in his arms, skin to skin, was the bliss I had longed for all my life."
1. Remember, this is describing the sex of a man in his 50s with a 9-year-old girl.
2. And remember too that this man in his 50s is considered by all Muslims today to be the "most perfect man" and "best model of conduct" (al-insan al-kamil; uswa hasana) for ALL TIME, not just for the 7th century. He is, in fact, so important and good to Muslims that they consider death to be an appropriate punishment for anyone publically mocking or condemning Mohammed.
Anyone with basic common sense can put these two facts together and come to the appropriate rational conclusion about Islam, and about so morally bankrupt as to support it and/or follow it. "