Kindergarten ABC's

By ALANA LISTOE - Independent Record - 08/17/08

Lisa Kunkel IR staff photographer - Five-year-old Katie Freeman reaches for a memory card while matching letters and pictures with her friend Rebecca Emter, left, last week in Helena. The girls, both five, are starting kindergarten this year.
After two years of preschool, 5-year-old Rebecca Emter is excited to start school in a few weeks.

“She’d go tomorrow if she could,” mom Beth Emter said.

Rebecca will begin going to kindergarten for half days at Clancy School, even though full-day kindergarten is offered.

Because Beth knows Rebecca has at least 18 more years of schooling ahead, she doesn’t feel the need to rush, and she says going to kindergarten half days will provide an adjustment period for her daughter to become acclimated with the public school setting.

After that, Beth will take it week by week, and when she decides Rebecca is ready, she’ll be open to sending her to kindergarten full time.

Deciding whether a child is ready for kindergarten can be daunting for some parents — Montana law says children don’t have to attend kindergarten and they don’t have to be in first grade until they are 7.

They can attended kindergarten starting at 5.

In some countries, like Sweden, Denmark and Finland, children don’t begin until the age of 7

The Helena School District will accept children for kindergarten who turn 5 by Sept. 10.

“We accept children where they are developmentally, academically, and socially — we work on all those areas,” said Teresa Burson, literacy and curriculum administrator for the district.

Helena doesn’t offer a formal kindergarten screening, but does supply information to parents who aren’t sure of their child’s readiness.

The East Helena School District held a kindergarten screening in early June.

Radley Elementary Principal Joe McMahon said the district focuses on evaluating fine and gross motor skills, language, and overall concept developments like letters and colors recognition.

Mostly, McMahon says, they are looking for possible delays so they can begin interventions early.

“We rarely ever advise parents not to bring their 5-year-old to school,” he said.

Of the 130 students screened in the spring, four will wait another year based on parents’ decisions.

Helena has approximately 535 kindergartners registered for the fall, and it’s unknown yet how many will opt to attend for half days instead of full days, which are being offered for the second year.

Lona Carter-Scanlon, principal at Jefferson Elementary, says oftentimes children are ready to attend full-time kindergarten at 5, but parents are the best judges.

“There are some children that just aren’t ready — developmentally, emotionally or socially,” she said. “They would benefit with another year of preschool or home with mom and dad.”

That’s how Chrissy Murgel felt about her son Connor. Chrissy waited until Connor was 6 to enroll him in kindergarten two years ago.

“He was ready academically, but socially he was so painfully shy, I couldn’t bear to send him that soon,” the Helena High English teacher said. “It made a huge difference because he grew so much academically and socially it was amazing to see what a difference one more year could make with him.”

Connor is now in second grade, and teachers tell Chrissy he’s not only a leader for other students but a good role model as well, which she attributes to that extra year of maturity.

Baby Center/Parent Center, an online resource for parents, found in an online poll that 63 percent of parents felt that children were ready for kindergarten at age 5. But the jury is still out about the effectiveness of sending a child to school at that age.

For example, a study conducted by the Cambridge-based educational journal Primary Review scrutinizes how primary education is organized and challenges the idea that an early start gives long-term advantages. The study found that there hasn’t been enough research in children’s later educational achievements to conclusively answer the question.

For parents, the research comes one student at a time.

Some base their decision on guidance from daycare providers, doctors or preschool teachers, while others go with their gut.

Kristi Freeman stayed home with her daughter Katie, who turned 5 in February, and didn’t send her to preschool. Katie begins kindergarten at Rossiter Elementary this year because Kristi and her husband feel their daughter is ready.

“She’s just at a point we both knew she was ready to start school and learn more than just what staying at home is going to teach her,” Kristi said.

Greg Upham said parental involvement and evaluation is critical. Upham, principal at HHS and parent of two who started school at age 6, said it’s the parent responsibility from the begining to continually evaluate their children. The decision when to start children is individual and the key is to make sure school is enriching at any age.

State Superintendent Linda McCulloch said it’s all about what happens in the next couple years after kindergarten that should encourage parents to start their children early.

“Research shows if a child can’t read at grade level by the end of third grade it’s very difficult for a child to catch up,” she said. “The more we can front load education, helping the child be able to learn their letters and things having to with reading is a good thing.”

Reporter Alana Listoe: 447-4081 or alana.listoe@helenair.com


Not Yet Rated


Untitled Document Please login to enter comment :
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Click here to register
Reader Comments:

careaboutkids wrote on Aug 19, 2008 8:37 PM:

" Whoops, the link to the study done by the Dept. of Education on the Reading First Program had a quotation mark at the end by mistake. Here again is that link without the quotation mark. It won't work otherwise.

http://www.tampabay.com/incoming/article483833.ece "

marquis wrote on Aug 19, 2008 5:19 PM:

" One can find a study to buttress just about any position. You reveal quite a bit about your worldview when you lump most parents into being ignoramuses about their kids and that life is a competition into which we must enter. I can't understand how some would think that a bureaucracy or its representative would know a child better than the parent. You also lament having a choice (Why should I have to choose which of 2 equally frustrating situations to put my son in) I think we should be thankful that we do have a choice and that it is not a governmental mandate. And you keep coming back to the parents who hold back to give the student a competetive edge....I thought that the idea behind putting them in earlier was to give them the so called edge. Which way is it? Childhood is a gift and our culture seems hellbent on injecting children into adulthood before their time. "

careaboutkids wrote on Aug 19, 2008 4:17 PM:

" I teach and have spent the majority of my career teaching 1st grade. I have seen the detriments to the child who has been sent too early. To send your child to school at age 5 1/2 is perfectly fine and those children for the most part tend to be ready. Children who are sent to school either just turning 5 in June, July or August and even worse yet, those who don't even turn 5 until after school starts are the ones who generally have difficulties not only adjusting to school but also in keeping up with their peers. I congratulate parents like the Murgels and principal Upham and his wife who made the difficult decision to wait a year to give their children the best possible start in school. I have heard the expression "you'll never regret waiting a year with a child who has a summer birthday, but many regret not waiting" - and I fully believe it. My daughter turned 5 in July and it was never a thought in my mind to send her to school - especially to all-day Kindergarten. She was ready academically but was definately not socially or emotionally.

Why are we in such a rush? For many, it is a financial decision as much as anything. By sending your child to school, you basically get a raise because of the amount of money you save in daycare costs - but how can you put a price on your child's well-being?

Also the other point I want to make is that education is not and should not be looked at as "one size fits all". I continue to be disappointed in the "leaders" of our educational system including administrators and even our Supt. of Public Instruction who have begun looking at education through such a narrow-minded view. Let's not forget that these are our CHILDREN and not simply statistics being scrutinized by the poorly designed and failing No Child Left Behind Act. If anything is failing our children it is this horrible government mandate and it's centerpiece, the Reading First program. Check out the following link to see the results of a study done by the Dept. of Education which shows how this 6 billion dollar program has failed to make even a slight difference in how our children are reading.

http://www.tampabay.com/incoming/article483833.ece "

elizac wrote on Aug 18, 2008 3:21 PM:

" On the other hand, numerous studies have shown that children held back from starting school are at greater risk for social problems when they reach junior high and high school. Furthermore, many parents truly AREN'T good judges of when their kids are ready for school, hampering them by holding them back because of blind ideology, unwillingness to start the lifelong process of letting go, and/or a desire to give their perfectly normal and capable kids an extra edge over the competition. I started my son in kindergarten at age 5 1/2 - his birthday is exactly in the middle of the recommended age range, so half his classmates SHOULD be older and half younger. Yet he is the youngest in the class, and has a few classmates over a year older than him. Some of his friends will get their drivers' licenses more than a year before he gets his. He is doing absolutely great in school, but he gets really frustrated that he must be compared with and compete against kids who had one more year of preschool, one more year of ABCs, who are several inches taller than him... because those kids' parents wanted to give their kids an advantage over everyone else. Yes: 'red-shirting' really happens - I know this because I have been told by some of the parents who have done it. But if I were to have jumped on that bandwagon knowing that he was going to be younger than his classmates, what would have been the advantage to my son? Why should I keep him back when he was bored with the old stuff and ready to learn something new? Should I have frustrated a kid who wanted so much to go to school, by telling him, "Sorry, you can't go this year because everyone else is too old, even though you are actually the right age to start kindergarten"? And what is the message those older kids get when they start figuring it out: "Well, we thought you were a little slow so we decided to hold you back because you needed all the help you could get"? Why should I have to choose which of 2 equally frustrating situations to put my son in? Montana has some great schools, but how are we doing compared to other states in terms of literacy, and in terms of putting our graduates (that means our kids that we love and who we have such hopes for) into successful jobs where they can make a living and feel proud of themselves? We need to look at other states, such as MN, where children who are 5 by September must go to kindergarten unless they specifically petition the school board. In nearly every such case the school board grants the waiver - but it inhibits parents who really don't have a basis for holding kids back except trying to give their kids an edge over everyone else. "

marquis wrote on Aug 18, 2008 8:10 AM:

" The sooner we can shrug off the responsibility of raising our children to someone else, the better, I say. School administrators, day care providers and physicians are way more qualified than we parents to make such weighty decisions about them. Why red-shirt your kid when you can get them in the game while they're still learning to use the potty without making a giant mess. "

marquis wrote on Aug 17, 2008 9:29 PM:

" The earlier that we as parents can shrug off the responsibility of raising our kids to someone else, the better, I say. School administrators and day care providers are much more qualified to determine these major decisions than we parents are. Why red-shirt a kid when we can get them in the game while they're still figuring out how to go potty without making a giant mess? "


Text Size:
Small | Medium | Large

View/Post Comments
 Email this story
  Print this story
 Rate Article
 Share Article

submit to reddit Delicious Digg!