Vote for McCain
By William Lumma, 7450 Raven Road - 10/06/08
Current rating: 3.5 with 133 ratings.
Click here to register
Reader Comments:
independantwoman wrote on Oct 10, 2008 8:01 AM:
REVEREND JOHN HAGEE
RICK DAVIS
KEATING 5
TERRY NELSON
KARL ROVE
GEORGE W BUSH
DICK CHENEY
ENRON
AQUILES SUAREZ
ARTHER CULVAHOUSE
CHARLIE BLACK
G. GORDON LIDDY
JIM HENSLEY
MR. URIBE
TODD PALIN
CHARLIE BLACK
DAVIS MANAFORT
Vote for McCain...I don't think so! "
ematt wrote on Oct 8, 2008 12:35 PM:
What a misinformed post (Oct 6, 2:56pm). I wonder what your reaction to this article is?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/08/opinion/08friedman.html?em "
MTRICH wrote on Oct 7, 2008 7:49 PM:
Interesting description of yourself and your views. I must say that your views are much closer to conservative than liberal in the description below. I know you have some issues to which you lean left but clearly you are a fiscal conservative and social liberal. Much closer to the center than I would have thought from reading some of your posts. WELCOME TO THE MIDDLE! :) "
Ethereal wrote on Oct 6, 2008 9:15 PM:
Okay, obviously the Republicans have not done the best job in the world...and lets face it, Dick Chaney's got Bush. You have them screaming patriotism and policing the world, when in all reality, I don't recall the invading several countries to reform them as the responsibility of the States. Every country has the right, as our own did, do have their own revolution. Not one forced upon them. I'm not bashing the soldiers or anything, just stating the simple fact that the United States has no business beginning to run any other country, when it is failing to run itself.
As for the "maniacal liberal socialism," you may want to rethink that statement. Everyone knows that Obama can't keep all of the promises he makes. No politician can. Especially when it comes to fiscal matters, as the President really has little control of it, beyond asking Congress or vetoing a bill. Thinking they can is naivet that I would hope voting citizens would not express.
I think it would be nice for a politician to balance political issues a little more. Make a plan for the economy, break away from the Bush regime, yet maybe realize gun control is probably not the best idea. Possibly bail out Wall Street, but punish those responsible, as has happened in the past. Maybe even, oh my word, raise taxes for those who make more, because the divide between the rich and poor grows every day, but use the increased taxes for the purpose of boosting the economy, like providing better college assistance, instead of waging war.
No matter how you look at it, extremism, in any form, is not good for this country, nor the people in it. The course it is on now is not acceptable, and change must occur. People will continue to bicker and fight, just as everyone is, about the "left" and the "right." The problem with this nation is that no one is in the middle anymore. And the middle is a lot bigger than a line. It's a space, a compromise, the ability to work together towards a common goal and a better future. It is not a place for the undecided; it is a place for the logical, the realistic, and the truly patriotic that believe this country needs to work in the best interest of ALL of her people. Not the rich, not the poor, but a balance.
"All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field." ~Albert Einstein
"Midas, they say, possessed the art of old
Of turning whatsoe'er he touch'd to gold;
This modern statesmen can reverse with ease -
Touch them with gold, they'll turn to what you please."
~John Wolcot
"Mankind will never see an end of trouble until... lovers of wisdom come to hold political power, or the holders of power... become lovers of wisdom." ~Plato, The Republic "
gun961960 wrote on Oct 6, 2008 8:11 PM:
thinkplease wrote on Oct 6, 2008 6:42 PM:
I also agree with your position on Bush. I laugh when I see so many people talking about how worthless he is. He had about a 75% approval rating heading into his second term, so 3 out of 4 people that whine about it do it just to be in vogue. Ironically, they then criticize politicians that flip flop on issues. True he could have handled a few things differently in hind sight, but that's a luxury we have now, when we weren't the ones running the country and needing to make the call. The problem goes back to the responsibility you were talking about: no one wants to take any blame, so they need a scapegoat.
I still stand by my original post, it was pretty non-partisan. Obama doesn't have the ability to change anything he is talking about. And McCain won't do anything noticeable to help either. Sure, I'd really like to keep Obama out simply because many of his ideas are socialistic, no two ways about it. Even Obama's supporters can see that. It's just a difference in beliefs I suppose. I don't personally understand the concept of "I don't have what I want, and you have more than I think you should, so you need to give some to me." I was raised with "if you want it, work for it." Apparently not all agree. "
diazo wrote on Oct 6, 2008 6:10 PM:
Liberals deny "personal responsibility for their actions"? Look, I take responsibility for my actions every day: in my profession, in raising my children, in paying my mortgage and my taxes, etc., just like every other liberal I know.
It's the economic elite that get to escape personal responsibility. Maybe you haven't heard yet about all the Wall Street welfare muthas with their golden parachutes whom we working people are now expected to clean up after, to the tune of $700 billion and rising? And yes, the melding of corporate interests with the state is the definition of fascism, whether you like to hear it or not. A true patriot knows this is a profoundly anti-American place that Bush is taking us.
I defy you to document even one of your little cartoon fantasies ("world free of taxes while maintainig free healthcare,free college education, lower gas prices, and eliminating all distinctions between social groups") as something Barak Obama has ever promised? Please,patriot, turn off the Limbaugh long enough to get your facts straight before you start on one of your screeds. "
BigP wrote on Oct 6, 2008 3:36 PM:
patriot wrote on Oct 6, 2008 2:56 PM:
The hatred for president Bush and republicans is beyond comprehension. If Obama is elected should all those who vote the other party have the same hatred for him. As an American and a patriot I will still respect him as the President and commander in chief, not call him names or refer to him with non-flattering terms. We are all entitled to our opinion and the freedom of choice in elections, I will not be able to sway the die-hard liberal bent on some demented idea of vengence against conservative values. "
diazo wrote on Oct 6, 2008 12:47 PM:
skosena wrote on Oct 6, 2008 12:39 PM:
I think we have the right to voice our opinions and ideas in any public forum...but to say that others are not "patriotic" because they don't agree with your point of view...well frankly I find that kind of attitude unpatriotic. "
thinkplease wrote on Oct 6, 2008 11:43 AM:
An awful lot of people throw around things they "know" on here. The sad truth is, not one of us knows anything more than what we are wanted to know. Research is spun, numbers twisted, outright lies told daily. Voting records don't mean much because of collaboration before a vote takes place.
To claim that you know something or to form solid convictions based on misinformation is only fooling yourself. So sit back and enjoy the high school popularity contest, er, the election for the President of the United States. "
BigP wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:53 AM:
skooter wrote on Oct 6, 2008 9:17 AM:
"Republican policies have sustained us in past economic crises"...WHAT??! REALLY? How about those policies led us into this morass? & you want 4 more years of the same?
"Their patriotic values are needed in rebuilding America" YES, because only Republicans are truly patriots. Purple & patriot tell us that all of the time.
"What kind of change will [Obama's] maniacal, liberal socialism bring? Who knows, you might ask yourself the same question about the CURRENT maniacal, conservative socialism that has us buying banks, mortgage holders and bailing out wall-street.
"a transparent tyro like Barack Obama" You can't have it both ways - is he inexperienced or a tyrannt (which would seem to mean he's lead something in a tyrannical manner - darn community organizers!!!)? Frankly, Palin seems more akin to someone who has run a public office (or two) in a tyrannical manner if everything we hear is true.
You can repeat all of the radio smears you hear, and even type them into a letter to the town's newspaper...but that doesn't make it any truer than when Palin or McCain or one of their campaign surrogates floated the crap in the first place. I know one thing, at least Obama/Biden is telling me what they'd like to do. MCCain/Palin can't talk about what they want to do because its more of the same, so they have to resort to constant attacks against Obama rather than talking about their plans. "
al wrote on Oct 6, 2008 7:58 AM:
AnimalLover wrote on Oct 6, 2008 7:21 AM:





olemontanaboy wrote on Oct 13, 2008 6:38 AM: