Objects to objector in ad
By H. Buck Urban - 11/13/08
Who, amoung your staff, was the dolt who allowed a “conscientious objector” to be placed on an ad for V-E-T-E-R-A-N-S? Some of the men and women on those two pages DIED in the service of their country. This is a huge insult to those of us who served proudly, and did not hide in cowardice. Your staff should have simply returned the doctor’s fees with a note attached that there is no interest in placing his name on pages of honor among those who have served, been wounded, and died in the service of our nation.
Shame on YOU doctor, for taking such an action. This is one veteran who has no interest in your cowardice.
H. Buck Urban
1301 Aspen St.
Current rating: 4 with 45 ratings.
Click here to register
Reader Comments:
olemontanaboy wrote on Nov 22, 2008 6:45 AM:
How are you trying to "shut up"? If you were implying to me that your comments in any shape or form has caused me to not make a comment then you are mistaken. Your rebuttal to the situation is childish and makes no sense. "I am a veteran and a liberal, what now?". If you need us to tell you how to lead your life then you clearly have conflict with where you currently stand. Thank you for serving this country. You deserve to be called a "veteran". If anything, I thought you would appreciate the fact that all these individuals are defending your right to be recognized for your service. I am not a veteran, but have several loved ones whom are. I can not say thank you enough for their sacrifices so I can enjoy the freedoms of being an American. I will always stand up to those that criticize our military and veterans. Those "draft dodgers" should not enjoy the freedoms of this country and should have never been allowed to return. It was ole Jimmy Carter that allowed this to take place. He was a great president (sarcasm please). He allows these draft dodgers to return to our great country with no consequence (abandoning this nation in its time of need) and then giving away the panama canal. That is the type of person I don't like. I could care less if they are liberal or conservative. Actions speak louder than words. "
MTRICH wrote on Nov 21, 2008 8:10 PM:
You have proven that you do not have to be a soldier to understand one. We forget that sometimes as we see so few who can put themselves in our shoes without actually having been there as you seem to be able to do. I appriciate your note.
Your brother and I are from different times but clearly from the same military. Thank him for his service.
AIRBORNE! "
gfguy wrote on Nov 21, 2008 4:51 PM:
I hold nothing but respect for the military. But making a blanket statement that those who don't serve are cowards just shows your ignorance. It's not always a matter of choice. "
naturalblonde196 wrote on Nov 21, 2008 9:47 AM:
obsethed wrote on Nov 15, 2008 2:08 PM:
dietz1963 wrote on Nov 14, 2008 12:16 PM:
I can give you a different perspective on this war thing with regard to the administration, things you probably don't know or understand. As stated earlier to alan_rainey, my name is Steven and my phone number is 465-9753. Give me a call. "
olemontanaboy wrote on Nov 14, 2008 11:59 AM:
The second point I would like to address is the idea that some feel Obama is going to come in a clean this "mess" up in Iraq like it will be an easy task. The reason why we are not out of Iraq is because work has not been completed. If we pull out today, all the work we have done will be for not because the opposition will rise up and squash allied forces in Iraq. They will not stop their either. They will bring it to US soil again! I can't believe someone could have the ignorance to say we went overseas for nothing and that Bush was wrong! Rewind your life back to 9/11. Remember the emotions that were flowing on that day. Remember that the nation as a whole called out for someone to rise up and stand up to these types of individuals. It is easy to say that it was a mistake when the press only tells you the negative or when a political candidate uses the negatives to slander the candidate he is running against. Find a vet from this war and ask him/her what good is happening in Iraq. He/she will tell you things the press will not. He/she will give you an accurate account of why we are there. He/she will say that it is a good thing we are over there. For those people that are so quick to jump to the opposition and oppose the war and ridicule our vets and commanders. If you enjoy the rewards of their sweat, blood, and tears, then you better learn to appreciate them and allow them to do their work. If you are against the war and against our democracy.......leave. We do not need you or want you here. Our veterans and soldiers need your support. They need to know that if they lay down their life for your freedom that you will not squander it. We take our liberties for granted. We do not acknowledge that if our Armed forces would not have rose up and fought back on 9/11 that day would have marked the beginning of the war, not in iraq, but on our soil. Thank you President Bush and all our elected officials and armed service men and women for making the decision to defend us and those in Iraq that could not defend themselves. Those of you that haven't joined in supporting our troops and elected officials need to get on the wagon because you're 7 years late, or get out of the country to learn and realize how good you had it! That is why these objectors are back in the US. They realize that this is a great country. A great country that was made great from the sacrifices of our service men and women! "
skooter wrote on Nov 14, 2008 9:56 AM:
Nothing to add different - but I wanted to say to MTRich that I thought his comment was very well put and points out that there can be SOME conscientious objectors (for religious or other reasons) who didn't drive to Canada, but served their country and fellow soldiers as (I do believe unarmed) medics.
Thank MTRICH - and thanks to all of the soldiers & vets weighing in for their service to our great country. "
gun961960 wrote on Nov 14, 2008 8:33 AM:
d wrote on Nov 14, 2008 8:25 AM:
Thank You Mr. Urban for your service. And I agree with your letter. "
buck_urban wrote on Nov 14, 2008 8:04 AM:
My father-in-law was drafted in 1967. His wife had passed away from a kidney disease the year before, and he had 4 children to take care of. Now, yeah, he could have gotten a deferment based upon his situation, but he chose to serve when his nation called. PFC Walter Handy gave his life near Pleiku in March 1968.
When I see people like the good "Doctor" placing his name on a VETERANS honors page, it chaps my hide in a big way. There have been lots of conscientious objectors in all the wars; thousands of them actually served in the military in non-combat rolls. One, a Quaker medic in World War II, won the Congressional Medal of Honor. He served on the front line without a weapon. Service does not mean you necessarily have to kill anyone.
I'll fight to the death for anyone to express their opinion. Some Conscientious Objectors, such as Mohammed Ali, suffered major consequences for their views. All I am saying is that if you choose to take that course, then please do NOT expect to join in receiving accolades in the same manner as people who EARNED those accolades. "
MTRICH wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:41 PM:
onemorevoice wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:23 PM:
abodox33 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 1:36 PM:
A member of the military service understands that it is his duty to stand up for his country.
I can't believe that anyone would have such a harsh opinion against his country and call their president the worst commander in cheif ever... I live in a safe secure America.
I am insulted by your comments about "men of principle," but I will leave you with a quote:
"I may disagree with what you say,But I will fight to the death for your right to say it"
That's the way America should be. Please try to learn to respect your country and your government! "
blueman13 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 1:30 PM:
Would you tell a teacher that public education is a joke? No, you wouldnt. By calling our job (that we bleed, sweat, cry and suffer for) "nonsense" you are in fact saying all we have done was worthless and stupid. While I am glad you can voice your opinion perhaps in the future you could exercise more tact. Maybe say, "the mission was not worth the cost we have paid" or "you don't want more soldier to die under inept leadership" something like that. I'm sure like me you take pride in your work it is an extension of who you are. You wouldn't want someone to disparage your occupation because it would hurt you. Now multiply that feeling by a hundred, that is how we feel. "
saber69 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 1:12 PM:
kensmail2001 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 12:39 PM:
Who did the vets vote for? Overwhelmingly for McCain.
By the way thanks to all veterans for allowing us the freedom of speech. "
enu22 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 12:06 PM:
dietz1963 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:29 AM:
I am sorry you have been misled. I know first hand that those for something will lean that direction, those against will go that direction. Now, if you would like to hear the WHOLE story on the current war, I would be more then happy to discuss it. Give you a "military perspective". I can be reached @ 465-9753, name is Steven.
Oh and concerning our pending pres...don't be fooled. He has stated to make the situation in Dafur "top priority". To do that, part of the agenda is: Ensure the full and effective deployment of a military force that actively protects Darfuri civilians and seek justice for the people of Darfur and hold the perpetrators of the genocide to account. What do you think that means? "
BigP wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:21 AM:
dietz1963 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:17 AM:
Object, as it your right. I might suggest a better time and place, not on a day that honors those that serve. Plenty of other times for your opinions. But I would ask that you do not fool yourselves into believing that we simply just go to war. In my experience, every possible diplomatic solution is used. I know this, because I served a real long time. Concerning the Iraq war, I tried to bring some perspective in a letter to the editor, unfortunately it was too long in words to be submitted.
Folks, regarding any war...I cannot say there is an absolute definitive right or wrong reasons for war, but can see there is a lot of information the public does not get for as to what eventually draws us into one. No one I have known in the military really wants to go to war because the absolutes are people are going to kill and people are going to die. People not directly in the fight are going to suffer, one way or another. And the cost will always be high, both in money and in blood. Freedom is not free.
Unfortunately for us, there are going to continue to be wars. These realities are why we have military. I am sure many of the people I have served with and those that continue to serve would agree, know and understand the job.
I have seen governments arrest or kill their own citizens for expressing their opinions. So be against war, just keep this FACT in mind.
It was my honor and priviledge to serve 24 years so that people (right or wrong) can express their opinions. Think of the alternative. "
alan_rainey wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:07 AM:
And yet here they are, brave men and women, fighting and dying for a blundering commander who made all the wrong decisions in putting them there, and blindlessly bent on completing a nonsense mission. Now that's truly is sad.
And thank God we will soon have a President that will address this fiasco the way it should have been done five years ago; something the current failure of a chief lacked the ability, courage, and intelligence to do. "
whatishappeningtomt wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:07 AM:
alan_rainey wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:32 AM:
al wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:25 AM:





mtjewel wrote on Nov 23, 2008 8:41 AM: