Divided on the Divide

By EVE BYRON - Independent Record - 11/19/08

Eliza Wiley IR photo editor - Gayle Joslin, a retired Fish, Wildlife and Parks biologist, strolls through the proposed site of the Montana National Guard biathlon course near the top of MacDonald Pass Tuesday.
MACDONALD PASS — Walking among a grove of mature aspen trees on Tuesday, Mike Garrity handed out copies of a lawsuit filed in federal court this week in an attempt to halt the construction of a biathlon course here by the Montana Army National Guard.

Next to Garrity, who is the executive director of the Alliance for the Wild Rockies, was author Jim Posewitz, representing the Helena Hunters and Anglers organization.

As they moved from the aspens into a towering forest dominated by lodgepole pines, the men agree that they’re an unusual pairing.

The Alliance is no stranger to the legal world, filing lawsuits fairly regularly to halt activities its members feel endanger wildlife and habitat.

But Posewitz ruefully noted that to his knowledge, this is the first time a Helena sportsmen’s organization has found it necessary to bring legal action against the U.S. Forest Service to protect wildlife habitat.

“Since 2005, we have been commenting on this proposal. We identified issues they weren’t planning on considering, like the lack of snow,” Posewitz said, looking at the brown ground below his feet, noting that it’s midway through November. “They didn’t look at cumulative impacts, and then there is the executive order from the president, to preserve hunting and hunting characteristics.

“The Forest Service never departed from the pre-conceived notion that this had to have their approval. So after a great deal of hesitancy, we decided to look into litigation to protect the wildlife habitat.”

In 2003, the Guard first proposed the course on 31 acres on the northwest side of MacDonald Pass.

Helena National Forest Supervisor Kevin Riordan issued a decision in June approving 10 miles of trails, 4,700 square feet of buildings, and only four months of use — which includes one event in July, plus numerous competitions and training in December, January and February.

This week’s lawsuit came on the heels of an announcement last week that the Montana Army National Guard and the Helena National Forest will survey the site and mark the access road, trails and facilities site, readying the property for a timber sale to clear the land for the course.

The logging could begin this winter, even though a funding source for the course hasn’t been identified. Initial estimates put the cost at $1.5 million.

“They’re talking about removing 32 acres of trees,” notes Gayle Joslin, a retired Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks biologist who is married to Posewitz. She stops among an aspen grove, adding that this will be clear cut for a 50-car parking lot. Further on, she points out tree after tree where bark has been scraped off by elk scratching their antlers. Grizzly bears move through the area, as do black bears, wolves, lynx, wolverines, deer and other species.

“There’s an incredible value in this place, between Montana’s Continental Divide and the Yellowstone ecosystem,” Joslin said.” This is the spine of their habitat, great country that’s been used for years by wildlife. We want this to exist for thousands and thousands of years beyond us.”

In approving the spot for the course, the Forest Service noted it’s near a major highway, a cross-country ski trail already exists in the area and adding to it won’t have a significant impact on wildlife.

Maj. Tim Crowe, chief information officer for the Montana Army National Guard, said Tuesday the Guard is taking the necessary steps to find out what the costs will be before looking for funding. He expects the course to be completed in the near future, but isn’t sure about a time frame.

Last week, a Guard-hired survey team flagged the anticipated biathlon route, which includes 10 new miles of trails that will connect with an existing cross-country ski track.

The surveyors also denoted the location of five new buildings totaling 4,700 square feet, and the parking lot.

“We need to get the design completed so the U.S. Forest Service can do their part of what needs to be done for the potential timber sale or timber mitigation for the project,” Crowe said, adding that the design work should be done in 30 to 60 days. “Before we can make an educated guess on the time line (to construct the course), the funding would have to be in place.”

The Guard also plans on using construction of the course as part of its training program for engineers and heavy equipment operators. Once the costs of doing that work internally are better known, the Guard can seek the necessary remaining funding.

“We wouldn’t go down this road if we didn’t think it had a very reasonable possibility of success,” Crowe said.

The biathlon course is within the Helena National Forest boundary, and Riordan issued a 25-year permit in June 2008 to the Guard for the course.

Biathletes are cross-country skiers who race, while occasionally stopping and shooting at targets. The Guard trains biathletes to compete in the Olympics.

The project is supported by some members of the Helena community, who note that the Guard has promised to enhance the existing course used by hundreds of people during the winter, as well as allow the public to use the biathlon course when competitions and training aren’t taking place.

Helena forest officials met with two logging company representatives recently at the site, said Duane Harp, Helena district ranger. The trees need to be removed before the Guard can start constructing the course.

But since the construction could begin by using internal Guard personnel as part of a training exercise, Posewitz, Joslin and Garrity fear that — without an identified funding source — the land could be cleared of trees and earth moved with heavy equipment, but the course never constructed.

Neither Harp nor Crowe expect that will happen.

“My conversations with the Guard have always been that they’re committed to the biathlon and will carry forward with it,” Harp said.

Still, that possibility, along with environmental and wildlife habitat concerns, led to the lawsuit filed Monday by Garrity and Posewitz’ groups in U.S. District Court in Missoula. Other plaintiffs include the Native Ecosystems Council and American Wildlands.

Those who filed the lawsuit say the course is within a narrow, 1-1/2 mile strip of public lands, bordered on either side by private property.

The biathlon course would impact wildlife traveling through this “corridor” between Yellowstone and northern wilderness areas, they say, including animals on list covered by the Endangered Species Act.

They claim the U.S. Forest Service violated national environmental laws in approving the biathlon project, and they are asking a federal court judge to issue an injunction setting aside the decision that authorized the course. They also want an injunction prohibiting work relating to the construction of the biathlon project, including the proposed timber harvest.

The lawsuit names both the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture as defendants.

Reporter Eve Byron: 447-4076 or eve.byron@helenair.com

3.9 stars
Current rating: 3.9 with 45 ratings.


Untitled Document Please login to enter comment :
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Click here to register
Reader Comments:

my2cents wrote on Dec 3, 2008 1:46 PM:

" Couldn't they find a spot that is already being killed by the pine beetles? Since those trees are/will be dead anyway? Just a suggestion from a "tree hugger". "

HakonMontag wrote on Dec 1, 2008 11:55 AM:

" Too bad most of the posters are tree huggers and don't care or don't understand what a biathlon is. As an Olympic event it is a demanding and exacting sport. Cross country skiing with marksmanship thrown in at regular intervals. To not make light of the "rifle fire" that would be involved they use 22cal rifles which don't make much more noise than a pellet gun. It has already been stated that the course would be open to the public when not being used for training. Let's not forget that to have such a facility could also bring in OLYMPIC events. Gee! The Olympics at Big Sky or the Great Divide with the Biathlon held right here. Naw...can't happen. Well it ain't gonna happen (ever) if the tree huggers get their way. Hugging trees is fine if that's your bent. So go hug one of them DEAD ONES that the beetles ate. I find it amuzing that only recently Great Falls and then Helena "declared" that the beetles killing all the trees was now an "issue". I guess they don't make it out of town all that often. Probably 90% of the trees between here and Butte are affected, dead or soon to be. Same is true for the road between here and Missoula. So what are the tree huggers going to do when they are all dead? Most of them are just good "forest fire wood" now as they are too rotten to be used for lumber. It's going to make one heck of a nice blaze. Bring lots of marshmellows and weenies. "

mission control wrote on Nov 21, 2008 9:50 AM:

" LOL, helenanative. That's the funniest post I've read here in some time. Thanks for the morning laugh. "

helenative wrote on Nov 21, 2008 7:52 AM:

" Yep, that's what I got out of this article too. That big mean National Guard is going to move in and take away my forest. And those big bullies are gonna make all the deer and wabbits disappear too! And since the Guard is a part of the Government...they must be behind the conspiracy to dupe people into voting for the open space bond! That's their hidden agenda, Montana National Guard wants to drill oil on Mac Pass!

Seriously though, how are they taking anything away? What about them enhancing the existing course and opening this new one to the public? Does that mean we could ski and shoot on it? Cause I love skiing...and shooting!! Sounds like a win win for outdoorsman to me. "

unidrummer wrote on Nov 21, 2008 5:42 AM:

" how would you idiots like to have someone open 2 rifle ranges next door to your house downtown and have to listen to constant gun fire in exchange for your ten grand a year property taxes you have to pay to get away from people! "

diazo wrote on Nov 20, 2008 8:41 PM:

" Capital idea, ematt! Now you're thinking like a good Republican. All we need is for the taxpayers to pay for a new interchange up there and we can have both, and probably a new Wal-Mart to boot. "

ematt wrote on Nov 20, 2008 9:21 AM:

" If this is such a great location how come BC/BS isn't building their new headquarters up there? "

diazo wrote on Nov 19, 2008 9:22 PM:

" We The People need to listen to Joe The Averagejoe37 and stand up to idiots like this news article, and all the other idiots who are news articles. Helena is certainly no place for those who love the outdoors. The only reason the "open space" bond passed is that Helenans were duped - they thought they were voting to "open space" for drilling. At least that's what I thought.

If the tree huggers don't appreciate having habitat bulldozed and being locked out of the public forest except when the Guard deigns to allow them in, they should go buy their own forest. In Russia. Or Missoula; same diff. "

Motorchild wrote on Nov 19, 2008 6:02 PM:

" As if any war was fought on a prescribed course under predetermined conditions. If you want to fight a war, train like you're in a war and not at a ski resort. "

averagejoe37 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 4:17 PM:

" When are we the people going to stand up to idiots like the this news article. The biathlon course will bring needed income into the Helena Community. These tree huggers need to go over to Missoula, maybe someone will listen to them. Go Guard!!! "

diazo wrote on Nov 19, 2008 12:48 PM:

" As a patriotic conservative who well understands the folly of conservation, I say kudos to the National Guard. We know that in the battle of man against nature, only one can survive. Where better to strike a powerful blow for mankind than the Great Divide, the very heart of entrenched Nature? And what better training could a Guardsmen ask for than skiing through what's left of the woods, shooting at things? This will be excellent preparation for our inevitable invasion of Sweden. The lack of snow will only improve our boys' leg strength. I call this a win-win all the way around, with even more winning in the middle. "

ruby wrote on Nov 19, 2008 12:12 PM:

" To say this biathalon course will obstruct the wildlife corridor is absurd. All we have to do is look outside our front door and in the center of Helena. We see deer daily, have seen porcupines and bears throughout the years too. I mean, really - this is yet another cause that has no basis. But because a person who lives near this area says it's so ... well, then, it must be right? I tend to believe these kind of people want the wilderness for themselves. After all, they built their homes there and they seem to think it should remain the way it is. What is it about the "I have mine and now it's off limits" attitude. Of course a law suit is what happened. There's gotta be a law that punishes those who file frivolously -- an accountability is in order here. "

dietz1963 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 11:44 AM:

" I see this as low impact also. I mean, come on. If someone really wants to do something, how about limiting the rich out of staters from buying up hundreds of acres? When I lived here years ago there were several places I went up in the mountains not far from town. Now all I see are fences everywhere with "keep out, private property". "

billyd wrote on Nov 19, 2008 10:56 AM:

" I defer to the wildlife biologists concerning the validity of their concerns. What bums me out is the loss of the solitude on those trails. 20 minutes from Helena is an excellent network of trails that, even on the busiest days of the winter, can provide a great sense of isolation and remoteness. Now, a trip up there will be punctuated with rifle fire. I'm disappointed, but perhaps litigation will successfully stop this crazy use of tax money. "

BigP wrote on Nov 19, 2008 10:30 AM:

" I guess my confusion comes in with the protecting habitat for wildlife. Right now the Fish, Wildlife and Parks are claiming that Montana is seeing a major rebound in wildlife in almost every area of Montana, so why is there a need to protect just this corridor area? What is the issue here? "

amperatt wrote on Nov 19, 2008 9:30 AM:

" The argument is definitely weak. However, given the era of obstructionist lawsuits we are going through, have no doubt that there will be one filed. Seriously, it is a seasonal biathlon course. It is not like we are building an interstate through it. Dramarama. "

Common Sense wrote on Nov 19, 2008 9:24 AM:

" The majority of trees are being killed by the pine beetle anyway. This is a very low impact site. I do wonder at the need for 5 buildings. I really don't think living quarters are needed, maybe just a maintenance and storage and warming facilities. Are they any plans available for veiwing? "

helenative wrote on Nov 19, 2008 7:35 AM:

" The argument is weak. Are you saying that these animals only use a 1-1/2 mile "corridor" to travel, cause they know it's public land?! lol...I think it would make more sense they would use private land where there is much less pressure from the public anyways.
As an avid outdoorsman and 4th generation Montanan, I think this course is a good idea. "


Text Size:
Small | Medium | Large

View/Post Comments
 Email this story
  Print this story
 Rate Article
 Share Article

submit to reddit Delicious Digg!