Groups trying to fix a ‘terrible plan’
By EVE BYRON - Independent Record - 12/02/2008
And most weren’t pleased with what they saw.
Non-motorized advocates noted that the proposed travel plan legitimizes user-made roads, not just those knowingly created by the U.S. Forest Service. Those who favor all-terrain vehicles, motorcycles and other motorized vehicles say the proposed action shuts them out of places they’ve ridden for years.
John Gatchell, Gayle Joslin and Jim Posewitz sat at one end of the U-shaped table, trying to translate maps into their on-the-ground knowledge of roads and trails on about 155,480 acres of public land in Lewis and Clark and Powell counties. The affected lands includes Black Mountain, the Tenmile Drainage, the Little Blackfoot/Bison mountains and four inventoried roadless areas: Electric Peak, Jericho Mountain, Lazyman and Nevada mountains.
“They’ve created routes that were previously closed and had been closed by other decisions,” noted Joslin, a retired Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks biologist, as she pointed to squiggly red lines on a small map. “They have routes that go to roadless areas with closures, but look like they’ll be sanctioned to go into those areas as well.”
Gatchell added that it looks as though snowmobile use would be recommended in the Bison Mountain wilderness. “This is a terrible plan. It’s a disaster,” Gatchell said.
At the other side of the room, Doug Abelin and Gary Petersen, members of the Capital Trail Vehicle Association, and other motorized vehicle users also studied the maps and felt their ideas were left out of the travel planning effort, which has been under way in various forms since 1999. Large-scale fires, budget constraints and new planning rules all put the work into a holding pattern until recently.
“They’re closing places we used to be able to go, and there are seasonal changes, too,” Abelin said. “We don’t see any point in that.”
Petersen added that some of the closures are being recommended at certain times of the year for the safety of deer, elk and other animals, but that motorized use doesn’t seem to affect them adversely.
“I’ve rode past deer, I’ve rode past elk and they don’t even notice us, but the Forest Service say they have to close all this for their security,” Petersen said. “This isn’t like the 1800s, where those animals have never seen a car or person or a bike. They’re accustomed to this stuff.”
Helena District Ranger Duane Harp listened to the comments, and helped orient those who showed up to discuss the travel plan, plus the handful of people at the Forest Service open house wanting to learn more about plans to cut dead or dying trees along 750 miles of roads in public lands.
Harp said the maps they’re working off of apparently aren’t completely accurate, and he urged people who find mistakes to report them.
Tuesday’s meeting was part of a “scoping” process, which is one of the early travel planning stages. At this point, the Forest Service has put out a proposed action and a couple alternatives. They’re taking comments from the public as to what issues should be considered as they put together an Environmental Assessment.
Overall, they’re proposing opening 74 more miles of road to over-snow vehicles; closing two miles of the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail to motorized used; and converting about five miles of existing roads to motorized trails only open to ATVs and motorcycles.
“We’ll do a content analysis and look at areas where issues are, like wildlife and fisheries, then see if we need to develop other alternatives or modify the proposed action,” Harp said, adding that he hopes the process will be completed within a year.
Harp smiled as he looked around the room at the wide range of people studying the maps.
“Obviously, their comments are all over the proverbial map,” Harp said. “Motorized groups want to see more routes open, non-motorized users want so see things closed. That’s why we’re doing this.”
Reporter Eve Byron: 447-4076 or eve.byron@helenair.com
Current rating: 4.7 with 16 ratings.
Click here to register
Reader Comments:
Adam Rissien wrote on Dec 2, 2008 11:46 AM:
Many studies show that motorized use harms wildlife and Wildlands CPR has a database of scientific articles proving this fact. In one issue of our journal, the RoadRIPorter, we provided a brief overview and cite to numerous studies.
Please see: http://www.wildlandscpr.org/biblio-notes/effects-motorized-access-wildlife-northern-rockies
Off-road vehicle impacts have become such a serious issue that it prompted Congress to convene Congressional Oversight Hearings to address the ongoing ORV abuse not only to wildlife but to all of us who want to find some peace and quiet on our public lands.
Please see: http://www.wildlandscpr.org/article/congressional-hearings-address-off-road-vehicle-damage "
Nutmeg wrote on Dec 2, 2008 8:59 AM:
The groups need to come together and develop a plan that serves not only their interests but that of our important wildlife corridors.
Snowmobiler or ATV enthusiast are always welcome to get off their machine at a certain point and go hunting, horseback riding, fishing, snowshoeing and hiking to the more fragile areas. And everyone will be better off - cleaner air, water and environment for all. "
Text Size:
Small | Medium | Large
View/Post Comments
Email this story
Print this story
Rate Article
Share Article
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
- Power temporarily out in Lincoln; storm stalls morning traffic
- Schweitzer joins call for infrastructure money
- Wall Street rebounds sharply after big drop
- Obama seeks to assure nervous governors on economy
- Northern lights for the nation
- 'Chemical Ali' sentenced to death in Iraq
- House leaders bicker over chairmanships
- Raising awareness
- Groups trying to fix a ‘terrible plan’
- Paintings, computers stolen from Montana Club
- Clinton joins her rivals on Obama’s team
- City agrees to increase Bill Roberts fees





garlint wrote on Dec 2, 2008 7:40 PM: