Abstinence not a waste
By Barbara LaRue, 1509 Cannon - 12/23/08
The abstinence message is sound and can save lives, if heeded. Simply put: no sex, no sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Planned Parenthood’s message is they provide “the tools to make responsible decisions…” concerning sexual activity but they can’t guarantee an STI won’t be contracted. If an individual contracts HIV/AIDS his/her future is bleak. After years of expensive chemical “cocktails” to keep the virus in remission the infected person usually dies. So, which of the two messages has the greatest lifesaving potential?
People run stop signs and suffer the consequences of their actions. Does this make the stop sign’s message dangerous? Should we stop spending money on stop signs? Money spent on abstinence education is not a waste. What is a waste are the people who will die from HIV/AIDS because they didn’t heed the abstinence message.
Current rating: 4 with 159 ratings.
Click here to register
Reader Comments:
Herbert wrote on Jan 5, 2009 7:43 PM:
purple wrote on Jan 4, 2009 10:47 PM:
I grew up in the 1950s. Back then, women generally remained a virgin until the wedding night.
Out of wedlock pregnancys occurred, but they were rare and when it did occur, the male did the honorable thing and married the girl. How often does that happen these days?
Back then, the boy usually went to the father and asked his permission for the hand of his daughter. How often does that happen today?
Far too many today have this "anything goes" attitude.
Society is paying a very heavy financial price for multiple decades of a lack of morals. The taxpayers are having to support the children born out of wedlock, in many cases for LIFE, because the "anything goes" attitude by the parents is picked up by those children who continue the practice of BILKING the taxpayers.
Both abstinence and safe sex should be taught.
What I object to is that only safe sex is being taught. Whether you believe it or not, Planned Parenthood is in the grizzly business of encouraging infantiside [murdering a fetus] through their policy of "only" advocating abortion. They should also stress giving the child up for adoption.
The events of the 1920s/1930s weren't as wide-spread as hollywood projects.
It is just like hollywood's depiction of WESTERNS. Contrary to their showing multiple shootouts on mainstreet, it rarely happened that way.
Back then, the vast majority of the citizenry actually packed heat. That six-shooter on their hip was primarily for self-defense against predators [animal and human].
Where did I advocate returning to the days of slavery? "
Ethereal wrote on Jan 4, 2009 5:46 AM:
This is not some perfect world, and better to teach all options than the way one person thinks is proper.
So, purple, as your military family obviously supports the freedom you fight for, you should have no problem with both both abstinence and safe sex being taught. Otherwise, hypocrisy would plague you.
And here's a thought, too: Move forward instead of dwelling on the past. This country is not back in the "moral" days of Temperance, Prohibition, and wait... Speakeasies, lack of women's rights, and lack of African American rights... Oh, the good days of...morality.
Unless you wanted to push us all the way back to the days of the revolutionary war...oh wait, slavery...
Where are these times of beautiful morality? I seemed to have missed them. "
purple wrote on Jan 3, 2009 9:03 AM:
YOU LOSE THE BET.
I have 3 sons, all of whom are either serving or have served in the military.
My oldest is Army AIRBORNE, an E-6 and going before the E-7 promotion board this month, and has been in for almost 8 years now. He has served a tour of duty in both Afghanistan and in Iraq.
# 2 son served 4 years in the air force and got out to pursue his education goal
My youngest enlisted in the Army Reserves right after graduating from high school this past summer.
And I served nearly 21 years in the military.
We are part of the warrior class in this country. Without the warrior class the rest would be living under one form of dictatorship or other with far fewer freedoms they now enjoy. Far too many of them take their freedoms for granted. "
militarymom wrote on Jan 2, 2009 12:02 PM:
diazo wrote on Jan 2, 2009 11:13 AM:
diazo wrote on Jan 1, 2009 6:18 PM:
And if they would only stay indoors they would never suffer from sunburn. So should we assume that this advice is sufficient and not tell anyone about sunscreen? After all, sunscreen is less than 80% effective.
Abstinence-only education doesn't work; where it has been tried there are more teen pregnancies, abortions and STD's, not fewer. One link to this informaiton has already been posted by my2cents.
Your insensitivity is, as ever, appalling. Happy New Year. "
purple wrote on Dec 31, 2008 12:16 AM:
Abstinence means fewer children born out of wedlock.
Abstinence means fewer fetuses being murdered.
Abstinence doesn't spread sexually transmitted diseases.
Abstinence doesn't spread HIV/AIDS.
Abstinence doesn't spread a decline in morality.
Yep, teaching abstinence is a bad thing for our society. Imagine this nation returning to the day when morals mattered. "
independantwoman wrote on Dec 30, 2008 1:39 PM:
my2cents wrote on Dec 29, 2008 1:52 PM:
Saw this article and remebered this forum. Just thought people may want to check it out. "
patriot wrote on Dec 29, 2008 11:55 AM:
Skooter, messenger and Duke have missed the point in this letter. Do we not raise our children to practice abstinence from a young age, or do we hand them a condom and a bottle of birth control pills before they get their drivers license.
Abstinence and sex education is not a compromise but should be taught in all schools, life is full of choices. Once you know all the facts then one can make their own personal decision on how to proceed. "
gfguy wrote on Dec 26, 2008 9:56 AM:
When the warnings have been out there about being shot, blown up, and/or killed once you've enlisted in the military and they ignore those warnings, then yep, apparently IYHO they are trying to kill themselves on purpose because they are going ahead and enlisting anyway.
You've got a rock solid argument.
...and a happy New Year. "
purple wrote on Dec 24, 2008 11:38 PM:
When the warnings are out there about UNPROTECTED sex and about using dirty needles when injecting illicit drugs into your body and they IGNORE those warnings, then yep IMHO, they are trying to get those diseases on purpose because they are doing nothing to prevent it from happening. "
my2cents wrote on Dec 24, 2008 9:50 AM:
purple wrote on Dec 24, 2008 9:13 AM:
If they contracted the disease through their own personal lifestyle choice, tough! "
messenger wrote on Dec 23, 2008 11:08 PM:
While practicing abstinence is the most effective way of not contracting a sexually transmitted disease, it is by far not the most realistic.
Not educating a teenager, who is full of hormones, on the proper use of condoms, dental dams, etc. is a terrible idea. "
my2cents wrote on Dec 23, 2008 3:58 PM:
I also would like to agree with skosena. I have completely enjoyed reading thedukeofhelena's posts. Merry Christmas to you all!! "
YourBad wrote on Dec 23, 2008 3:42 PM:
mtsilvertip wrote on Dec 23, 2008 3:16 PM:
Ms. LaRue states that due to lifestyle choices, lives are wasted needlessly, and you people spin that to say that people with HIV/AIDs are a waste.
Gyroscopes can't spin nearly as well as the left in this country.
Absinence while waiting for your spouse can't increase pregnancy or STD's anymore than walking increases your chance of dying in an airplane crash.
If you don't pursue the activity, you don't suffer the consequenses.
Merry CHRISTMAS to all. "
ccsaintdawg wrote on Dec 23, 2008 2:44 PM:
skosena wrote on Dec 23, 2008 12:11 PM:
gun961960 wrote on Dec 23, 2008 11:47 AM:
thedukeofhelena wrote on Dec 23, 2008 11:31 AM:
kensmail2001 wrote on Dec 23, 2008 10:21 AM:
Safe-sex is not safe. Condoms work less than 80 percent of the time.
promoting safe sex is dangerous! "
clancycoot wrote on Dec 23, 2008 10:03 AM:
gfguy wrote on Dec 23, 2008 8:27 AM:
Burying your head in the sand and thinking that teaching abstinence only will solve the problem is naive at best. Giving them information to help them make careful choices is the best we can do.
Oh, and Ms. LaRue, it sure is nice to hear that you think of people with HIV/AIDS as a waste. You're just brimming with compassion. "
patriot wrote on Dec 23, 2008 7:45 AM:





MTRICH wrote on Jan 5, 2009 8:52 PM: